 |
The federal elections in November 2004 provided the first opportunity for The Print Debate Center. During the election cycle, Print Debate Officials discussed our level playing field debate platform with candidates across the country.
To remain non-partisan, Print Debate Officials followed strict protocol guiding the contact of candidates that ensured that all qualifying candidates received an equal opportunity to embrace Print Debate and challenge their opponent. Absolute non-partisanship is an essential component of Print Debate. Learn more on how Print Debate remains non-partisan >
Efforts in the organization's first election cycle were educational for both candidates and the Print Debate Center. Attempts to add to the political dialogue in federal elections earned a strong start, as the candidates below embraced the Print Debate level playing field.
Below is a grid of Print Debate's early adopters:
(Click the blue dots to read the documents)
| District/Race |
Challenge Letter |
Challenge Forum |
Statement Forum |
Press Release |
 |
IA, Senate Art Small challenges Charles Grassley |
 |
 |
 |
 |
UT, Senate Paul Van Dam challenges Robert Bennett |
 |
 |
 |
 |
CA, House District 15 Raymond Chukwu challenges Mike Honda |
 |
 |
 |
 |
IL, House District 14 Ruben Zamora challenges Dennis Hastert |
 |
 |
 |
 |
IN, House District 7 Andrew Horning challenges Julie Carson |
 |
 |
 |
 |
NY, House District 23 Bob Johnson challenges John McHugh |
 |
 |
 |
 |
NC, House District 12 Ada Fisher challenges Melvin Watt |
 |
 |
 |
 |
OH, House District 16 Jeff Seemann challenges Ralph Regula |
 |
 |
 |
 |
TN, House District 6 Nick Demas challenges Bart Gordon |
 |
 |
 |
 |
TX, House District 31 Jon Porter challenges John Carter |
 |
 |
 |
 |
UT, House District 3 Beau Babka challenges Chris Cannon |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |