Home
What is a Print Debate?
Print Debate
Historial Timeline
Fundraising
Print Debate Terms
Generic Print
Debate Forum
How the Print Debate Center
Remains Non-Partisan
Citizen Interaction
2004 Federal Election
Print Debates
Sample Print Debate:
Kennedy/Nixon in 1960
Is a Print Debate
Too Idealistic?
About The
Print Debate Center
Press Room
Contact Us
2004 Debate Results

The federal elections in November 2004 provided the first opportunity for The Print Debate Center. During the election cycle, Print Debate Officials discussed our level playing field debate platform with candidates across the country.

To remain non-partisan, Print Debate Officials followed strict protocol guiding the contact of candidates that ensured that all qualifying candidates received an equal opportunity to embrace Print Debate and challenge their opponent. Absolute non-partisanship is an essential component of Print Debate. Learn more on how Print Debate remains non-partisan >

Efforts in the organization's first election cycle were educational for both candidates and the Print Debate Center. Attempts to add to the political dialogue in federal elections earned a strong start, as the candidates below embraced the Print Debate level playing field.

Below is a grid of Print Debate's early adopters:
(Click the blue dots to read the documents)

District/Race Challenge
Letter
Challenge
Forum
Statement
Forum
Press
Release
IA, Senate
Art Small challenges Charles Grassley
UT, Senate
Paul Van Dam challenges Robert Bennett
CA, House District 15
Raymond Chukwu challenges Mike Honda
IL, House District 14
Ruben Zamora challenges Dennis Hastert
IN, House District 7
Andrew Horning challenges Julie Carson
NY, House District 23
Bob Johnson challenges John McHugh
NC, House District 12
Ada Fisher challenges Melvin Watt
OH, House District 16
Jeff Seemann challenges Ralph Regula
TN, House District 6
Nick Demas challenges Bart Gordon
TX, House District 31
Jon Porter challenges John Carter
UT, House District 3
Beau Babka challenges Chris Cannon